Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 171.54

+0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (76778)	5/1/2008 12:40:42 PM
From: ihavenoidea	Read Replies (2) of 196577

Like I said, I figure that the board would go ballistic if Q accepted the compromises that I would find acceptable. qcom only got "amenable" with their $100M offer after they had been handed their head by BRCM. I don't look for qcom to negotiate with themselves. Furthermore, their stock is doing fine. the more it creeps up to the high 40's the less pressure on qcom management to settle. Again, 6% sounds pretty reasonable. I'm not worried about Armageddon. Nok is much more pragmatic than qcom. They would just continue using qcom IP without paying for it and wait for it to get settled 10 years from now. There will always be some amenable person on the qcom team that will be willing to forgive interest. B/t/w/ if your suggesting that my compromise is reflective of "go(ing)ballsitic" you are only kidding a kidder.<g> i.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next