hello tom daly,
<<Well that makes two of us because I don’t have one either>>
well, gee, and i thought you had a solution involving granting the dalai lama a country of his own that never existed. if no, fine. if yes, then why not give everyone a country of their own?
then we can move on to the merits of the dalai lama's clam, and find that denying his claim of a country of own is as good as but no worse than denying the american indians their native land, all of it.
<<So you have all the facts?>>
probably more than you care to admit, and in any case, irrelevant, because i merely need to know you do not recognize all the facts.
<<Maybe someone should ask the Tibetans about their notions and dreams>>
... which tibetans? why not the israelis and palestinians? now come, stop fidgeting and shimmying, where are you on the issues far more urgent than tibet, and in which you have a potentially more effective say in influencing outcome?
<<Agreed. Outside intervention is rarely a solution. There can be some short term positives (Bosnia, Darfur) but long term they never seem to work very well.>>
... ok, we are on the same page.
<<Never claimed that it was or wasn’t part of China>>
... very wise. cb thinks tibet is not a part of china, and so one must also conclude that none of the 50 states is a part of the united states, and yet she is not ready to pack her bags. You chimed in try to ring some bells, and it is reasonable to figure that you believe whatever the dalai lama believers wish to accomplish as opposed to what the daila lama claim to recognize, unless we are to count on you being naive.
<<Then fixed? By the “great helmsman’s army? By the red guards? By the public security bureau? Fixed?>>
in a manner of speaking, because cult-based serfdom is obviously no more in tibet. do you deny the truth?
Now, back to this Message 24554163 (linked here as i would not want you to shimmy away from the obvious questions) one step at a time, now that i have clearly shown you where i intend to go toward.
i am guessing we are not going to get an answer out of you on either israel being threatened with extinction or palestine facing genocide (as you applied that term to tibet, i am not figuring you think what is happening in gaza is less genocidal than tibet, correct?), correct?
thought so ;0)
i am also guessing you have no genuine intent to vacate n.america.
it is safe to guess that you are not advocating the return of california to the mexicans, yes? or no? or no comment?
in any and all cases, given there are only so many ways you can go with the above stated hints of points, and given that you refuse to engage on them, choosing to focus on the manufactured issue that is tibet, we can apply the term h.y.p.o.c.r.i.t.e. to you with quite a measure of safety. |
