Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (76836)	5/3/2008 1:08:14 PM
From: BoonDoggler	Read Replies (1) of 197253

Thanks for weighing in on this, C2. I don't have any legal knowledge, but I do have some common sense, and I am pretty confident that Judge Strine will have a good chuckle before he rejects Nokia's absurdity. Stock Farmer's arguments sound pretty far-fetched to me (You've already licensed to me, Q, but I don't like your rates, so that means I get it for free until you offer me rates I like), but what do I know. If the Nokia interpretation of French law approach were to be correct, I daresay that the Nokia interpretation means that ETSI hoodwinked everyone involved with this surreptitiously inserted aspect of French law. I am certain that was not ETSI's intent. Something as drastic as what Nokia suggests would have been made explicit.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next