and so i do not then get your points, because a lot of folks of all sorts defined however you would live in the geography known as tibet
there are instigators against the status quo
there are law enforcement actions
what was before was awful cult-serfdom
good for the few
what is now is better for the many
and that is all there is to it
and should there be a discussion about "was it worth it" about something that has happened already, then that would engender other questions, none of which we are likely to have answers for, as in, for example,
"is it worth it to allow the self-exiles to return and do anything they may want to do whatever the doubtful merit of their tenuous claim? i.e is anything advocated once by britain and then the cia good for the folks of tibet?"
"should the precedent be set, however set, then where else might the act be applied to? globally? why not the 50 states of USA, Gaza, Israel, wherever else? chosen by whom? hhollywood flakes? when 80% of China's water comes from Tibet? Be real."
"what are the dalai lama's global advocates doing about the invasion of iraq? oh, nothing. no questions about "is it worth it?" - how unusual. ignore them, for are they not h.y.p.o.c.r.i.t.e.s?"
chugs, tj |
