SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (382785)5/6/2008 1:12:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 1573941
 
"Yes, but I posted the article to counter the common charge that Jefferson was an atheist, agnostic, or deist, hostile to or skeptical of religion entirely. "

Haven't seen anything about him being an atheist. I have seen the claim that he was hostile towards conventional Christianity.

He didn't like the miracles. And that is well documented.


The latter statement is accurate. The part about him being hostile to conventional Christianity isn't. He often went to church by himself, took part in the services as a normal congregant, and this after he'd left public life.

"Personally I think atheistic naturalism shouldn't be taught as science either."

What do mean "atheistic naturalism"? If you mean evolution, well, it is something that is provable and has actual proof behind it.

I mean the things taught by Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Bill Provine, PZ Myers, etc etc etc. and my college biology teacher years ago.

evolution, well, it is something that is provable and has actual proof behind it.

Afraid you're wrong about that. Its based on a narrative involving things that are said to be possible. Which isn't to say much of it isn't factual. Just that its provability is grossly misstated.

This may help you:

whatyououghttoknow.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext