MCCAIN CAMPAIGN: "We have all become familiar with Senator Obama's new brand of politics. First, you demand civility from your opponent, then you attack him, distort his record and send out surrogates to question his integrity. It is called hypocrisy, and it is the oldest kind of politics there is. . . . We understand why Senator Obama doesn't want to engage in a debate over leadership and judgment with John McCain, but the American people demand that debate take place."
Background here. Obama wants to run a training-wheels campaign while demanding that his opponents walk a tightrope. Well, hell, who wouldn't want that?
UPDATE: In the comments, some good advice for Obama from Michael Totten:
Obama could easily make this go away: “Hamas will be VERY sorry if I am America’s president. They need to be careful what they wish for.” He doesn’t have to say anything else, but I doubt it occurs to anyone on his staff to go after Hamas instead of McCain. To me, that’s the obvious fix. What could McCain possibly say after that?
Alas, however, Obama's instinct was to strike out at McCain instead.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Scott Slater emails:
Dear Glenn,
Got the 2008 Democratic Presidential Survey in the mail today.
Question #7 - " Do you believe that John McCain's pledge to keep troops in Iraq for another 100 years will be a liability in the General Election?"
I answered "No. He didn't say that. You are smearing him."
Question #11 asks "How likely do you think it is that John McCain and his Republican allies will launch a "Swift Boat" style smear campaign against our presidential nominee?"
I checked "Not Likely, but I noticed you have (see question 7)."
It's the new politics of change and hope! And by "checked," I presume he means "wrote in," as I doubt that was one of the original options . . . .
posted at 07:56 PM by Glenn Reynolds
instapundit.com |
