SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony@Pacific & TRUTHSEEKER Expose Crims & Scammers!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ravenseye who wrote (5407)5/12/2008 1:58:32 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) of 5673
 
Commenters who opposed the proposal to narrow the options market maker exception stated that the
proposed amendments would disrupt the markets because they would not provide sufficient flexibility to permit
efficient hedging by options market makers, would unnecessarily increase risks and costs to hedge, and would
adversely impact liquidity and result in higher costs to customers.37 These commenters stated that they believe the
proposed amendments would likely discourage options market makers from making markets in illiquid securities
since the risk associated in maintaining the hedges in these option positions would be too great.38 Moreover, these
commenters claimed that the reluctance of options market makers to make markets in threshold securities would
result in wider spreads in such securities to account for the increased costs of hedging, to the detriment of
investors.39

sec.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News