SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (123003)5/13/2008 2:52:56 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
"Because that "speech" is not likely to intimidate, incite a riot or other violence......."

The objection by the Latino activists is not that it is likely to do these things. The objection is that it is an illegal hate group. The objection is bogus. However, the reason the sign was taken down was the intimidation, pressure, suggestions that riots or other violence would result if Caltrans did not take it down.

BTW is that how you define free speech? If someone doesn't like the speech and threatens riots or violence then that speech should be forbidden? I know you don't, based on your other comments.

Your application of principle is inconsistent. If you've been wondering why you lose every argument with me? There it is...and its why you always get caught in your own web of disingenuous mean spirited tripe.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News