SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mistermj who wrote (21588)5/14/2008 5:29:08 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Go look at the graph yourself. 1960 is the highest sunspot cycle. It was also a cool period. I pointed that out in the post with the graph. There is no pattern in the 1900-2000 sunspots vs. temps. They don't match. If you think they do, show me on the graph. Copy and paste to your computer, and mark it up using Paint and repost here. I'll happily look at what you produce. But as I've stated, it is not there.

There are a number of papers that have come out of northern europe claiming all sorts of nonsense about sunspots & temp reconstruction. I don't know of any which have received significant support in the scientific literature. If you can find one that has widespread acceptance, please post a link here. The graph that looks like it fits the best is one based on complete nonsense of solarcycle PERIODS, not sunspot number, and it achieves this dubious success by inverting the phase as needed (i.e. just to make things fit). It is crap.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News