Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KLP who wrote (250463)	5/18/2008 10:47:41 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (2) of 793931

I just viewed the most sickening program on Fox. They had a roomful of people who didn't support Bush; although a minority had voted for him in the last election only one would vote for him again. They played the clip where Bush said something about the false hope of "appeasement." "That doesn't work, does it?" Then they had the group say why they didn't think it worked. Then they played Obama's response and everybody thought it was wonderful. So what did the moderator expect? If he had a balanced audience, he'd have gotten a different response. I do not get it. Bush's comment resonated with me, while Obama's is based on inexperience and slick rhetoric. Later on they started talking about how the people in the audience didn't reject the message so much as the rejected the messenger.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next