i>Why should anyone think Ahmadinejad doesn't mean exactly what he says?
That is a very good question Brumar, but unfortunately one that libs can't hear.
They have it all figured out, and therefore do not have to listen.
You and I hear what people say. We take them at their word (unless they signify that what they are saying is in jest, so we laugh) and understand their meaning completely. If we don't understand. we ask direct questions until we get direct answers. We look at history, and we learn. This is how we know where we stand, where we are in the greater scheme of things and what we need to do next. If there are disagreements, we try working them out and are willing to fully explain ourselves and what we mean. We are willing to compromise in order to keep the peace, but like all humans, we stand on our principles. We are pretty much unforgiving if you try to deceive us, but we are certainly willing to listen and forgive if there is some unfortunate misunderstanding. Lie to us, and you're persona non gratis as far as we're concerned.
Liberals don't hear others. They don't want to hear any one else. They'll tell you that they are more compassionate, more interested and more cooperative. More intelligent, more inclusive, more democratic than conservatives, but really what they are is focused.
Like the Constitution, history is living and can either be manipulated, revised or ignored.
They are not really interested in what you or I or Ahmadinejad have to say. They are narrowly focused on implementing their ideology, and because they don't listen, are incapable of understanding you or me or Ahmadinejad, regardless of how well meaning or seriously dangerous.
We are naive regarding their one world order. We must be educated. And we shall be educated by being told how it is over and over again until we submit.
Thankfully, 99% of liberals are pacifists, so we're not in any great danger.
;) |
