Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (385451)	5/21/2008 10:47:13 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) of 1575267

>>> Bush actually equated the act of negotiations with appeasement. Appeasement is "granting concessions for peace". Any negotiation with Iran implies appeasement because Iran's position is one of war. They have said Israel is a stinking corpse that should be destroyed. This leaves no doubt as to their position. ANY negotiation that changes Iran's position would be, by definition, appeasement, UNLESS one subscribes to the theory that Iran is going to make a concession in their position without the US conceding something, which is of course, an irrational claim. This point has been addressed by numerous commentators, including McCain, by asking the all-important question, "What are you going to say to him?" When an adversary is holding a gun to your head you are in no position to negotiate; you can only appease. There is zero doubt that Bush was absolutely correct in his characterization. Now, whether most observers realize this is a different matter, and I'm not sure they do, so it may be true that McCain was hurt by it. Over time, I think Obama's innocence on these matters will come back to hurt him.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next