Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 231.94

+0.1%

Jan 20 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fastpathguru who wrote (252227)	5/21/2008 2:08:15 PM
From: wbmw	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Re: Even if the 9th circuit's discount attribution standard is applied? You seem to have think that because you have found a new standard among your legal sleuthing, that it must be something new that nobody knows about, and Intel must be guilty of it! As for myself, unless there is a specific incidence that is known to the public that we can analyze as amateur lawyers on this forum, then it does not make sense to point to every new piece of jargon you find and proclaim it as the latest smoking gun. If you have a specific incidence that you know Intel has violated, then please present it here. Otherwise, you are not arguing anything new. It's just as easy to speculate that Intel is innocent of this "9th circuit's discount attribution standard" than it is to speculate that Intel is guilty. And that ambiguity through lack of facts is what makes this argument moot.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next