SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (67338)5/21/2008 2:54:17 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) of 542201
 
>>First thoughts: Magic numbers<<

John -

The author's point about how Kentucky and West Virginia would probably not have been perceived as being so important if the primary calendar had been different is a good one.

I think he got some of his numbers wrong, though. In one paragraph he says that Obama has the lead in popular votes, but presents figures that show Clinton with a larger total.

I also have to point out one of my pet peeves in word usage mistakes. He says, "Sen. Chuck Schumer, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, kept his near-perfect record in picking nominees in contested primaries in tact with yesterday’s wins by Bruce Lunsford in Kentucky and Jeff Merkley in Oregon."

The word is "intact". It's not a phrase. I've also seen people say, "in tack", which is worse.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext