2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.27

-0.2%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (35038)	5/22/2008 12:56:02 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) of 217980

the problem, and it is a big problem, of reaching the high watermark is that in effect we are being given a second chance to maybe do the right or wrong thing again, the issue being what is the right thing? the situation with oil, if continued, will cause major pain for all non-energy/non-pm stuff, which would be ok given my current stance but if oil is squeezed up because some fund is in process to have an accident that would trigger market/exchange intervention by officialdom, then what is the nature of the accident and the flavor of the intervention? something may be wrong, as gartman noted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next