SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (386340)5/25/2008 6:28:40 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1575036
 
"The deal was incompetent from the outset. "

In what way?

They cheated on the program. Period, end of story. Yes, it may (stress MAY) have reduced the number of plutonium weapons they have. But it allowed them to cheat, creating a uranium enrichment program. They should not have been allowed to do that, and they should not have been allowed to build even a reduced number of plutonium weapons, which was Clinton's, not Bush's, fault.

I dunno, your objection seems to be that you didn't like it but can't really put your finger on the reason.

I'm opposed to appeasement in any form. Ever.

It did what it was supposed to do. It stopped NK from developing plutonium bombs.

It slowed the process but allowed them to have the enrichment program. Gallucci, on Frontline, said basically that "Trust but Verify" doesn't work, and you have to settle for "not trusting and taking whatever verification they could get. Wel, that's freaking stupid. You don't do deals that way.


"Clinton administration officials have admitted privately that they agreed to the '94 plan solely because they believed NK would collapse before the LWR project was completed. A Clinton crapshoot gone wrong. "

I'd have to see a link about that.

I posted the article earlier. It was a WAPO unattributed quote that read exactly as I posted it. I assume if WAPO said it, they had a source for it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News