Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (386489)	5/26/2008 8:47:58 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) of 1574117

"CJ, you still haven't explained why Clinton hoped North Korea would go away before he had to build the LWRs, " Beats me. I think that was s dumb position. "if giving North Korea the LWRs was such a good idea." Other than the expense, why would it have been a bad idea? They already know how to build and operate exactly the type of reactor we don't want them to know much about. And LWR experience in no way, shape or form is useful for the development of nuclear weapons. Unless they get experience with the fuel cycle, which was going to be handled by the US and South Korea. And, even if they get control of the rods somehow, so what? It isn't like there is anything there they can use for anything except possibly for a radiological weapon. And they already can get those materials. Through the Paks, if no one else. Heck, Israel might even sell that stuff to them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next