SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 166.81-4.1%Nov 17 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (77326)5/27/2008 9:44:07 AM
From: Jim Mullens  Read Replies (1) of 196660
 
Slacker, re: INTC vs QCOM (MIDs, etc), and >>

....but if a vendor isnt a player in the US, I doubt that all of the overseas CDMA markets will persuade them to absorb the cost of adding DO to a HSPA device.

What in your estimation is the “added cost” ???

1) Notebooks-

….With QCOM Gobi solution the notebook mfg appears to gain significant scale by manufacturing one device that supports virtually all markets. Would not this advantage off-set any potential cost difference in the Gobi baseband vs just a GSM+ 3GSM baseband that is supposedly cheaper? I recall Sanjay saying they (& Novatel/ Sierra Wireless) were pricing Gobi very aggressively to “jump start” this opportunity.

2) MID’s –

….In devices / markets where the processing power of QCOM’s Snapdragon is good (powerful) enough, the Snapdragon chip also includes the baseband whereas the Intel solution requires a separate baseband solution. Would not this give the Snapdragon a cost advantage?

…..or, at least cost parity …. With the added advantage of power savings of not only the Snapdragon itself but also resulting from power drain from hard wiring the separate baseband to the Atom processor?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext