SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. - Off-topic postings
CSCO 73.11+0.3%Oct 31 9:30 AM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Lynn5/31/2008 8:02:49 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 230
 
I started getting really OT in a reply to Sonki on the main CSCO thread. This was Sonki's posting:

Message 24633621

It was Chamber's comment that he sees economic recovery starting by the end of the year that set me off on an OT reply: I have not gotten to the point of pessimism shared by the survivalists in an article I posted here (2 postings before this one?), but I am concerned. Putting energy concerns to the side right now, I really, really think our banking/financial system *has* to get it's act together make recognizable strides towards U.S. economic recovery. From the following article, it looks to me as if they are missing the boat:

CNNMoney.com
Long waits for short sales
Wednesday May 28, 9:59 am ET
By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer

Banks say they want to help troubled homeowners, but they are delaying deals that could save everyone - including the lenders themselves - a lot of time and money.
Lenders are taking much longer than necessary to approve short sales, according to Duane LeGate, of House Buyers Network, a short sale specialist.

ADVERTISEMENT


In a short sale, a homeowner who cannot keep up with their loan asks the lender to take a dollar amount less than what is owed on a home's mortgage, and forgive the remainder of the unpaid debt.

So if a borrower has a mortgage balance of $100,000 and finds a buyer who will pay $95,000 for the house, the lender agrees to accept that $95,000 and close out the loan.

"There was a much greater chance of success with these in the past," said LeGate

Ideally in a short sale, everyone wins. Borrowers avoid the ugly foreclosure process that destroys their credit, while lenders recoup more of their costs than they would by spending the time and money it takes to kick an owner out and resell the property.

Lenders typically lose about 19% of a mortgage's value in a short sale, according to Clayton Holdings, a Conn.-based, provider of loan analytics, while they lose an average of 40% on loans that go into foreclosure.

Coldwell Banker CEO Jim Gillespie agrees that short sales are taking too long to complete. And he speaks from firsthand experience; a short-sale offer he made on a house in Marin County, Calif. in late fall didn't win approval until April.

But most buyers can't, or won't, wait that long."That's been our biggest challenge - keeping the buyers interested long enough as we wait and wait for an answer," said Jeff Morrell, a Colorado Springs real estate agent who specializes in short sales.

Running out the clock

John Fitzmorris, a short-sale expediter in East Stroudsburg, Pa., was working with Robson and Laura Pereira, who were behind on their mortgage.

"She worked, but he had a construction business that went defunct," said Fitzmorris. "That put them in trouble."

Falling home prices in the area made a normal sale impossible; the couple was upside-down in their mortgage, owing more on the property than it was worth on the current market.

After they fell behind on their payments, Laura Pereira said, "the bank sent me a letter asking me to call for help. I called them four or five times and they never got back to me. We had three [short sale] offers on the house at the time."

Fitzmorris, who has been doing short sales for more than 20 years, contacted the bank about a short sale well before the foreclosure date.

But after three months, the bank still hadn't approved the short sale, and the Pereira's property went to sheriff's sale. (The bank did not respond to several requests for comment.)

"The offer we sent to the bank was $129,500," said Fitzmorris. "But another investor, TM Builders, bought the property at the sheriff's sale for $100,265."

In the end, the bank lost $60,000 on the loan, when it could have lost $30,000 by doing a short sale.

Ironically, TM Builders flipped the home to Fitzmorris's buyer for the $129,500 short-sale price, money the bank would have gotten had it acted more quickly.

"The sellers did what they could to mitigate the problem but the bank didn't respond, which hurt both the sellers - with an unnecessary foreclosure permanently impacting their credit - and the bank," said Fitzmorris.

Usual suspect

The difficulty in getting short sales approved stems from the same hurdles facing all the other foreclosure prevention efforts. The fact that the majority of mortgages are pooled and securitized makes it hard to get approval to change the terms of the mortgages.

"It has to do with who owns the loan," said LeGate. "If a mortgage is stuck in a pool somewhere, when something goes wrong, no one knows who the actual owner of the note is."

Additionally, the volume of troubled borrowers makes it hard for lenders to keep up. The housing crisis has put an enormous burden on mortgage servicers, the companies that manage loans for securities investors.

At many servicers, said LeGate, "There's no one really skilled at loss mitigation, and these guys have more work than they were prepared to do."

And with foreclosure filings breaking new records each month, there's no sign that this problem will ease any time soon.

Says Laura Pereira, "I feel the bank really let us down."

biz.yahoo.com

Lynn
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext