SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (21811)6/1/2008 6:22:06 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
The sum total of your content has been:

1) Look at this graph
2) Its informational content is obvious
3) Gee look at N Africa's net heat loss.
4) Clearly if Co2 had any affect compared to H2O, N. Africa should not have net heat loss.
5) There is no science showing CO2 can affect anything (perpetual Watson Chant)
6) The chart somehow shows something about H2O and longitude.
6) neo is a liar and denies the obvious, yada yada. (perpetual Watson Chant)

Then repeat 1-7

The depressing thing is that you and Hugh are the only AGW deniers who post here who do in fact have some technical training, the rest of the sorry lot seem to lack any scientific training.

Unfortunately, you can't even function at a HS science level anymore. Up your AZH medications, would you?

If the chart contains any useful information, take it as a challenge to carefully and concisely list it, and how it relates to H2O and C2O, and why you think N. Africa supports your claimed deductions. You can't of course.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext