SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (21812)6/2/2008 10:28:48 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
it is amusing to see lying neolib has been reduced to nonsense babble... h20 varies in ppm from hundreds of times CO2 to thousands of times CO2 from day to day from hour to hour and one sees no ability of CO2 to change heat radiation loss when h20 is only hundreds of times that of CO2. yet lying neolib asserts there is science showing CO2 can affect radiation loss.

fossil proxy math masturbation of data is not science. and lying neolib has shown zero comprehension of any science.

Why does the liar deny the truth posted below.
What the figure shows is obvious! But to continue your lies about CO2 you cannot admit to seeing the obvious.

Nothing has changed. And as you state, it does not matter " if the atmosphere had zero CO2 or 5% CO2." Well the atmosphere has zero % CO2 and if it doubled, it would still be at a zero % level.

To reach 1% CO2 would have to increase 26 fold.
But the obvious variation of h20 by several percent by longitude is quite evident.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News