Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (388356)	6/4/2008 1:12:48 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 1574247

Like Smirk, he could have opted for choices that would have never placed himself in the line of fire. As the son of an admiral, he could have had a billet that put him in the sights of cameras and not the enemy. He chose not to take that option. Like Gore, he made the more dangerous choice. So I can understand, are you saying that as a National Guardsman Bush could not have been placed in the line of fire? It is my recollection that some Guardsmen -- though a small number, did serve in Vietnam. Further, joining the Guard was making a military commitment, even though it might keep someone out of Vietnam -- it is far more, for example, than Obama has done. Perhaps we can read Bush's mind concerning whether he was attempting to avoid service in Vietnam or whether he was choosing to serve in a different, yet totally legitimate manner. To suggest that Gore's service is somehow superior to Bush's is really not an appropriate comparison. Both served, honorably, and should be respected for their service. While I find a lot of fault with Al Gore, he wore the uniform and nobody can take that away from him. Or from George Bush.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next