SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 168.26+1.5%Dec 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pseudo Biologist who wrote (2721)10/16/1997 4:19:00 PM
From: Ian@SI   of 10921
 
I think his analysis is nothing short of disgusting. It would appear that he merely looked at the ratio without looking at the underlying numbers. Both $ booked and $ billed were up. Yes $ Bill rose more than $ booked. So it's no surprise that the Book to bill is a smaller number. His conclusion as reported is asinine.

I have no strong opinion on this however. If I get off the fence I'll let the thread know what I really think. ;-)

P.S. Did you really mean to write fried rather than friend? If so, I'm sorry I missed the barbeque. I would have been happy to bring the gasoline.

Ian.

RE: Our fried Ming Pan, now with Cowen, is cited here:

biz.yahoo.com

Best wishes,

PB


P.S. Go to semichips.org for a good description of book to bill. Those posted in the prior posts are misleading. Essentially, 3 month seasonally adjusted moving averages are used to calculate the ratio. It is a ratio. i.e. If Aug were $8 ordered and 6$billed then book to bill is 1.25 . If Sept were $11 ordered and $10 billed, the book to bill just fell by .15 to 1.1 However, more revenues were earned and more orders were booked than the previous month. Book to Bill as a standalone ratio means next to nothing.

Ian.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext