SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (72425)6/16/2008 8:22:19 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 542213
 
Karen,

You are taking the discussion of the Guantanamo decision down a path it doesn't need to go. The issue before the court was not how to handle battlefield prisoners but how to handle prisoners, however classified, that have been held several years at Guantanamo. Without any serious hearings as to whether they merited such a charge.

For instance, as I understood the lead case, he was arrested in Bosnia after the Bosnia courts decided they had no case against him. Hardly a battlefield decision.

I fail to see how the issue of prisoners held for many years without a hearing as to their status goes to the question of whether Afghanistan is best understood in terms of a war model or a criminal model.

Moreover, Linda Greenhouse's commentary on the decision includes the following lines, lines showing how Kennedy meant to limit the scope of the decision to Guantanamo and to prisoners long held away from the battlefield.

To the contrary, Justice Kennedy’s analysis made clear that the decision was limited to Guantánamo by the special nature of the American installation there as well as by the remoteness of the base from any zone of hostilities.

nytimes.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext