kitcocasey.com - good, thanks, alright let's take the headline intersection of CRD-12, '292.00 metres averaging 1.16 grams gold per tonne, 11.65 grams silver per tonne, 0.07 per cent lead and 0.40 per cent zinc' ... calculator says that's rock value of usd47.96/t ... let's multiply times 292 metres for comparison = 14004
386-metre headline intersection of KP 25-08, 0.437g/t Au, 46.2g/t Ag, 0.784% Pb, 0.756% Zn ... calculator says rock value of usd66.10/t ... times 386m = 25514
14004 vs. 25514, hmm, advantage ktn ... and that 386m ends in mineralisation [don't know about CRD-12]
Now that's only two headlines, any useful comparison would involve plugging in a whole lot of numbers, all posted figures for all holes really, great deal of grunt work, it would help to have two screens to avoid flipping back and forth from one browser window to another [i have one only], it would also help to like diddling with columns of numbers [i don't, especially in springtime] ... but i think it's worth doing, and no bad reflection on cpq.v either, they are quite rightly getting attention for what could easily be the next Peñasquito, going about it in highly professional manner too, good outfit ... the thing is, Kootenay is getting similar results if not better overall [don't know], from a huge target area based on geophysics, and is known only to the few of us, still has a market cap of around one quarter that of Canplats ... as of today, anyway |
