SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AuBug who wrote (60082)6/21/2008 10:17:38 AM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) of 78410
 
I think at 150 bucks a tonne, the fuel cost of generating electricity from the coal would be 0.06 dollars per KW hour, but I am not sure on that calc. I take that from how much CO2 coal produces per KW hr. (7.78 * 10^-4 tonnes per KWH.)

One BTU equals 2.93 X 10^-4 KW hrs. But electric conversion efficiency is only 35% on average. New high heat turbines or Stirling engines promise about 46%, so we will use the higher figure.

9300 btu/lb coal should produce 4278 BTU's of electricity at 46% efficiency. This is 1.25 KW hrs of electricity. (1 KW hr - 3413 BTU's)

If GXS coal cost say, 120 dollars per tonne, then a lb of it would cost $0.054. 5.4 cents. At best the cost of making electricity by the fuel cost would be 0.054/1.25 = $0.043/KW hour. Reasonable.

Of course we know with fuel prices today, domestic energy costs must increase. If coal, which makes the majority of the world's electricity increases in price by 3 to 5 times in 8 years, then electricity must play catch up, as politicized as its prices usually are. Utilities cannot go into hock or the infrastructure and industrial capacity of the nation breaks down.

****************************************************
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext