SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gary Mohilner who wrote (9301)6/28/2008 1:58:40 PM
From: dybdahl  Read Replies (1) of 71475
 
Most claims about energy usage these days are totally bogus. I think there are a few parameters to how much pollution you're actually producing:

- How much money you spend
- How high tech is the product
- Where does the product come from

If you're buying a tomato, produced by your neighbor, it's probably very little pollution. If you're buying some high-tech vehicle for a lot of money, it's probably pollution a lot. I guess the production of the car electronics alone produces several tonnes of waste.

I once saw an article that claimed that the energy that goes to manufacture tires is about the same as the energy used to drive the car. I don't know if it is true, or has been true, but a modern car engine is actually a very efficient way of using fuel.

Remember, it takes less oil to go 10 miles by car than by foot - because going 10 miles by foot requires you to eat extra food, and that requires more extra oil than the car would use for the same distance.

If you want to be energy efficient, consider this choice ;-) picasaweb.google.com

Personally I believe that taxing fossile fuels is the only thing that works in a good way if you want to save energy - this reduces the complexity for consumers to picking the cheap solutions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext