SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Adams who wrote (104133)6/30/2008 8:46:00 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) of 206299
 
i think partly it's a problem of definitions. the argument that large cars are less safe comes down to maneuverability. obviously large cars do not maneuver as well, so are more likely to get into collisions.

the argument against small cars is that, in a collision with a large car, they will lose. however, they may be more likely to avoid collisions in the first place.

so, if you know you are going to collide, a large car would be better. if you want to avoid colliding, a small car is better. of course, if a large car collides with you, you are SOL.

in a place like Texas, where many people have large vehicles, i have my doubts about the safety of small cars.

but as consumers move to smaller cars over the next decade due to high fuel prices, it will probably become safer to drive small cars due to reduced risk of getting mowed down by a big car.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext