SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rocket Red who wrote (121116)6/30/2008 10:27:49 PM
From: hank2010  Read Replies (1) of 312983
 
Yes, I have been to coal ops in Canada, USA, Europe and Africa.

I stand by my comments in post to Traderworld.

Remember oil and gas concessions were not open to acquisition for coal when GXS drill hole announcements were made. Everybody had equal chance when the O & G concessions came open.

How do you tell the best ground when everything is buried?

GXS imo should have the best ground based on first to know their own drill results, but we will only know after the other cos drill theirs.

I did note WER core was from drilling kimberlite in 1994. that is why it is suspect.

If coal goes from GXS land to WER land, in a flat lying deposit in a flat lying structure, odds are the cos in between will also have coal and odds are quality will be between that of WER and GXS.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext