SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22103)7/8/2008 8:22:07 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
well pearly I read the babbling, but found no equations or science explaining the claims. Nothing about how the almost 1 part in 10,000 increase in CO2 observed in the last century is doing anything to create the supposed observations.

In that CO2 has not warmed the troposphere, CO2 has not been shown to thin or cool the thermosphere. Solar cycles that cause a 20,000 to 30,000 PPM and larger changes in the amount of solar energy radiating the earth do cause warming and cooling effects on the thermosphere and the stratosphere and the troposphere.

But true demented will insist 1 part in 10,000 CO2 will dominate the 200 to 300 and even greater changes in parts per 10,000 of solar output.

Engineers call that kind of science mental retardation.

If you have any real interest in reading genuine science with explanations the should be comprehendable by laymen.
arxiv.org Gerhard-Tscheuschner-FalsificationOfCO2Greenhouse-arxiv.org-0707.1161v3.pdf
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News