SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (397371)7/9/2008 10:55:50 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1575654
 
By the way, if adjustments are made to the ceiling of income on which the contribution is levied, the increase may not be as high on low wage earners, if any at all.

This is true, but just consider for a moment the original game plan. Tax was paid on the first $1,000 or so of income, and as late as the 70s only on the first $3,750 at a rate of something like 3.3%. Now, we're faced with 15-16%, or perhaps 14% if we removed the wage max altogether. And that is presuming the trustees are right (and they haven't been yet).

So, we need to be giving up nearly 15% of our earnings just for the OAB program. Add to that the Medicare program, which is a total train wreck, and you will see a flat 20% raked off the top of every earned dollar.

Now, combine that with a 30-50% in federal and state income taxes, and the picture becomes very clear -- an attorney who would earn $300,000 is now 90-100k after taxes.

If you can't see how this is a problem, you're blind. We complain about inflation and currency devaluation, but nothing kills us worse than taxes on failed social programs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext