SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22123)7/10/2008 11:47:46 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
When I was in High School, I was doing some physics and all the current proponents of CO2 dementia were doing coke, pot and lsd.

When dealing with black body radiation, the physics, the equations and the empirical constants (empirical constants, numbers made up and assigned to make the equations work.) all really deals with that of solids bodies. That is to say the constants only work with solids and less so with liquids and are meaningless with regards to gases.

You can find emissivity constant for different matter and liquids, but none for gases. All CO2 dementia is based upon the incorrect application of physics of black body solids. That is what one knows if one can read and research the correct and logical explanation of the known laws of physics.

If the equations worked for gases, then there would be experiments in the lab showing how for different concentrations the gases transmitted or radiated as blackbodies. You can find no such information, it must be so so super secret.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News