SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22156)7/13/2008 1:02:24 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
So you say there has been a lot of work done on the issue. That graph you reference comes from a brilliant piece of explanation of the history of much of the science and sham since the nineteenth century.

From your comments I conclude you have not read or even glossed over original source of this document in PDF and Tex format is located at The Cornell University Library.
arxiv.org Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

It is an amazing work by Doctors Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner.

You questions show an overwhelming non comprehension of the obvious meaning in the many posts of genuine science I have made.

This is a good statement of what I know.

It is possible you do not have the intellectual tools or desire to know the real truth.

This statement I believe to be the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And it does directly imply there are thousands who consider themselves science knowledgeable and are truly delusional.

4.3.3 Conclusion A statistical analysis, no matter how sophisticated it is, heavily relies on underlying models and if the latter are plainly wrong then the analysis leads to nothing. One cannot detect and attribute something that does not exist for reason of principle like the CO2 greenhouse effect.There are so many unsolved and unsolvable problems in non-linearity and the climatologists believe to beat them all by working with crude approximations leading to unphysical results that have been corrected afterwards by mystic methods, flux control in the past, obscure ensemble averages over different climate institutes today, by excluding accidental global cool- ing results by hand [154], continuing the greenhouse inspired global climatologic tradition
of physically meaningless averages and physically meaningless applications of mathematical statistics. In conclusion, the derivation of statements on the CO2 induced anthropogenic global warming out of the computer simulations lies outside any science.

For my part, I have found Gerlich's and Tscheuschner's paper to be so brilliant, I am taking several tens of hours to transform the pdf into a html document.
The work in progress is toms.homeip.net
Click on the blinking outline. It work well.
Final edit formatting still needed beyond page 78
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News