SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nevada9999 who wrote (123361)7/15/2008 1:17:13 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (5) of 312906
 
Well I understand what you say. I did not compare size of AGC to GXS at all, just mentioned their relative value per ton.

I agree with what you say. GXS truly has world class potential while AGC has not at this point in time.

But nothing is scealed when it comes to GXS potential of 2-4 billions tons of coal. They could have only 100-200 millions tons and the coal could be worth just a bit more than what the PRB coal is worth (which is less than what the gold per ton at AGC deposits is worth), or could even be worth less. It could be worth a lot more I agree.

I also agree that GSX potential will be reveal very soon, unlike AGC.

The only thing I disagree with is the idea that the market value of GXS which is already $300 millions is a bargain because it will go to $2 billions ($100/share) or possibly a lot more.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News