SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (29040)7/16/2008 5:16:42 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
and the one that I referred to which SPECIFICALLY granted that status to children of American citizens born in the Canal Zone --- but which was enacted some *one year* AFTER McCain's birth. <g>

But since the issue is his parents citizenship it doesn't really matter.

So there is no need or point to repeating "one year after" again and again.

If either A, or B is needed to achieve C, and you can prove that B didn't happen, that doesn't imply that C wasn't achieved.

And in this case there still is some doubt about "B." Because "one year after" doesn't necessarily imply, anything about him not being a natural born US citizen, unless the law explicitly did not apply to people before the time of its passage.

--

You never did give me your definition of "natural born" as it applies to "natural born US citizen". You seem so certain that McCain doesn't qualify but you never made any argument directly on that narrow issue. The only definition that would seem to support your case would be that "natural born", in this context, means "born in the US" and nothing else, but I can't see anything in the constitution, in federal statues, in USSC decisions, in logic, or in English grammar, that backs up that idea.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext