SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (22339)7/19/2008 8:19:09 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
I know very little about climate science compared to someone who works in the field. I also know very little about biology compared to someone who works in the field. I read widely on both topics, and have enough of a technical background that I can generally understand peer reviewed papers in both fields. From long observation of political/religious intrusion into science, I can detect BS fairly well. The problem is not my being "superior" to others it is that ALL of those bashing AGW here, unfortunately lack even what I have. Even without a technical background, you can learn a lot if you are willing to put in the time and effort. Why not try?

Even with zero technical background, someone should be able to read up on the charlatans involved with the Oregon Petition, and draw the relevant conclusions. Why is this difficult?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News