SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (76007)7/22/2008 6:44:29 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) of 542009
 
Allen -

Fair enough, I apologize for not reading your post more carefully.

In regard to conservation. Sure why not. Why not do both? Why does doing one mean you cannot do another? Drill, build nuclear, wind, solar, coal, conserve, the whole nine-yards.

Personally, I would be in favor of a HUGE tax subsidy for those who purchase high mileage vehicles. Over 40mpg, gets a 5 grand tax break. I've driven a small car on and off for years, mainly, because I saw no reason to have two vehicles that got poor gas mileage. And small cars are more fun to drive. I would really love to buy one of those Smart Cars that I had a blast driving when I lived in Italy a few years ago. And talk about easy to park! Haven't taken the plunge yet, but a 5 grand incentive might motivate me.

Huge tax breaks for solar placed on new construction homes in the south seems logical to me too.

However, the oil economy is not going away anytime soon, so why not open up more areas for drilling too?

Do it all and stop sending billions of dollars overseas to cart in oil via tankers. Boundaryless solutions is what I support.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext