SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (22438)7/23/2008 4:20:21 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Yes, water has some unusual properties near to freezing density wise.

However it makes not one whit of difference regarding the analysis!

A surface cooled near a warmer surface by radiating energy though it into space.

The atmosphere has a substantial heating effect on the Earth and the 2nd law of Thermodynamics rules the process all the way. If you treat heat like some sort of caloric fluid, yes you won't understand a thing. The caloric model will work for basic analysis, like central heating but will fail when dealing with determination of a planets temperature with an atmosphere.

Here are some figures. Take note of the very large percentage figures attributed to radiation.
=================================================

Earth Heat Gains
short-wave radiation from the sun...............34.7%
long-wave radiation from the atmosphere.........65.3%

Earth Heat Losses
Long-wave radiation to the atmosphere...........75.5%
Long-wave radiation to space.................... 4.1%
Evaporation from oceans/lakes/land..............15.6%
Convection and conduction to atmosphere......... 4.8%

Atmospheric Heat Gains
Short-wave radiation from the sun...............11.9%
Heat to atmosphere from condensation............14.4%
Heat to atmosphere from convection/conduction... 4.4%
Long-wave radiation from earth..................69.4%

Atmospheric Heat Losses
Long-wave radiation Radiated to Space...........40.0%
Long-wave radiation radiated to earth...........60.0%

These values derived from graphs and charts from the textbook "Meterorology
Today," (4th Ed.) by C. Donald Ahrens.

This is a greatly simplified summary of the radiation balance. Each of the
above factors involve other effects, such as albedo, solar angle, selective
absorption of radiation by atmospheric gases such as carbon dioxide, ozone,
water vapor, et.al., scattering and reflection of solar radiation, etc.

You can see some interesting observations from the above data though. One
suprise may be that the earth receives almost twice as much heat from the
atmosphere as it does from the sun. But the sun only shines on a given point
on the earth half the time, while the atmosphere radiates continuously.

The earth receives about one-third of its heat directly from the sun, but
less than 5 percent of the heat from the earth is radiated back to space or
>about the same amount that is involved in conduction and convection in the
atmosphere


newton.dep.anl.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext