The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: maceng2 who wrote (22453)	7/24/2008 10:51:05 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) of 36917

That Arthur P. Smith wrote a babbling hand waving 10 pages see, see, see that, see that. There is nothing developing or explaining connections or foundations to the basic laws of physics. It in no way developed an argument supporting the bogus interpretation of the 2nd law. It was bull. It you believe it does you have bought Arthur P. Smith.s Brooklyn Bridge. So tell us Pearly plus one, what is the obvious to all you claim is explained by Arthur P. Smith If it is not bull, where is the CO2 signature. It is independent of the temperature going up or down. Does Arthur P. Smith explain how 1 part in 10,000 will raise the temperature by 1 part in 10?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next