View from the Center and Left Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (76229)	7/24/2008 4:06:50 PM
From: biotech_bull	Read Replies (1) of 543273

"Discriminatory" to me is a matter of process and intention, not a matter of result The intent here is to cover recreational sex for men but not women. One cannot ignore that there are major physiologic differences between men & women - men don't get pregnant. If men had a risk of getting a 10-lb lump on their back for nine months after sex, and if there were a pill that prevents it and is not covered then we are in a non-discriminatory mode. The easy answer is not to cover Viagra because it's recreational and men are going to pay for it without complaining - a bit like cosmetic surgery which is not covered, but doesn't stop people from paying $$$$$

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next