SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22473)7/25/2008 10:26:42 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Any person who works to the establishment that CO2 was a significant player in determining average global temperature,
Clearly led a wastful life propagating ignorance of truth.

Now according your physics, if you put a cold stone at 0F in a room filled with 70F air. The stone and it's radiative forcing heats the room. I doubt you can understand that the claim the atmosphere is heating the Earth is the cold stone claim.

In the Kalahari dessert the temp goes from 140 plus to 40 plus in the day night swing. It has been measured that desserts even in equatorial latitudes are a net lost of radiation on an annual basis. Yet CO2 like the cold stone is heating the Earth.

When you have an ac voltage, electrons flow out and then in. There is some resistance in the wires and thus heat is created at the source of power and in the wires. By the false and selective physics of IPCC the time when the is voltage is postive the heat generated due too wire resistance is the load heating the source.

The concept is contrary to the 2nd law's true meaning.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext