SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RealMuLan who wrote (82058)7/25/2008 4:52:04 PM
From: Archie Meeties  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
Less driving is all around better for the health of the people. But expensive fuel is worse for business as it imposes a tax on the flow of goods.

When Cuba was forced to go to bicycles after the USSR collapse the level of fitness went way up. You can directly correlate ER visits for lung problems to levels of car pollution (after factoring in wind conditions). And of course the accidents go down as you point out (time to go long automobile insure co's?)

Unfortunately, people have been fascinated with owning their own glorious transportation since chariots and carriages - there doesn't seem much turning back. The best policy is to tax the consumption of fuel that is detrimental to health, much the way cigarettes are massively taxed, but that approach will be fought tooth and nail by corporations. However, if done well, those taxes can be put into infrastructure for mass transit or to support railways.

On another note, around here the local drunks tell me they can't afford as much alcohol because of the cost of gas and so they're able to stay drunk only 2-3 days vs 5 days. Don't ask me how I know this. -g-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext