SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (401897)7/26/2008 9:20:30 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) of 1576528
 
"Some of what you say is true but some of what CJ also is true...."

I did mix LNG and CNG up. However, I will point out that if you take my post and replace the LNG with CNG, it is accurate. Now, I did mix the two up, but that should have been clear to anyone knowledgeable in the subject. Because I talked about the lower energy density and all.

So, I did make a mistake with using LNG instead of CNG. However, everything in my post is correct for CNG except for the liquification. And nothing else is changed.

"What I don't understand is the amount of NG we have in this country."

Current consumption is about 2 trillion cubic feet per year.

tonto.eia.doe.gov

Proven reserves are somewhere around 150 trillion cubic feet.

naturalgas.org

At least in 1999. Unproven reserves are much higher. And most of it is on land and so cheaper to drill for.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News