SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22565)7/31/2008 12:43:00 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
dear pearly plus one, I have looked at all kinds of work on CO2 done in the past 50 years. There is no work showing how 1 part in 10,000 could have any more effect than at most 1 part in 10,000.

All the bull on the 20% effect and the black body crap is bull that is based upon an interpretation of laws of physics that ignore the meaning of the 2nd law of thermodynamic and the simple math that 1 part in 10,000 is not 20% or 100 to 400 parts in 10,000.

Only delusion and scientific stupidity hand wave, duh I have a model dat shows 1 part in 10,000 is acting like 20% or more of 100 to 400 parts in 10,000.

And all the real world data show 1 part in 10,000 cannot be detected as any percent as the model predicted.

As to sun spots, The have a real bearing, but also there is a better understanding of ocean currents that show a very good correlation with global climates.

But only delusion cannot comprehend the 1 part in 10,000 of CO2 to 100 to 400 parts of H20 in fathoming exactly what drives the greenhouse gas effects.

I do dismiss all work that ignores the simple math of parts. That is not science, it is stupidity. It is the foolish work of the recent alchemists looking to convert 1 part in 10,000 to a 20% factor.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext