SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 49.25+0.9%Feb 3 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (36672)10/18/1997 12:37:00 AM
From: Ibexx   of 186894
 
josef,

Re. What is your strategy when you buy leaps. In, at or out of the money? 1999 or 2000?

I have posted on this subject numerous times, thus I shall try to be brief here.

If you look at the statistical time decay of a call option, the time premium begins to erode exponentially beginning somewhat around 9 months before the expiry date.

For high quality stocks with a sustained growth curve such as INTC, I would pick a strike price such that it would become in-the-money (or at least at-the-money) 9 to 12 months before the expiry.

This way I would capture the sweetest spot of an option where the "delta" change is the greatest (namely, right before coming into money) while still enjoying a window of safety. For instance, I might expect INTC reaches $110 in April of 1998, and the 99LEAPS for me to consider would be the one with strike price of $110.

In general, I dislike deep-in-the money LEAPS (they are for the wimps only) as I look for maximum leverage (balanced with safety) which the D-I-M options do not provide.

For y2k LEAPS calls, I would go further out-of-the money by applying the above empirical rule.

Hope this helps.

Ibexx
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext