SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (37866)8/4/2008 10:28:53 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) of 224756
 
The way McCain orchestrated the roll-out of his energy policy is a good indication of how firmly he's fallen into the Cheney bear hug.

The roll-out began with a scare tactic to soften up the public -- the spreading of a false rumor that China is drilling for oil off the coast of Florida – in the territorial waters of fellow communists in Cuba.

If the Chinese are drilling in our waters, why shouldn't we? That was precisely the point of an uber-masculine Wall Street Journal opinion piece titled Drill! Drill! Drill! that followed punctually in the disciplined message orchestration. It supplied the mantra for the McCain energy policy and rallied the faithful.

That set the stage for McCain to announce his policy in Houston last week, where he called for oil drilling in US coastal waters and for the development of US oil shale in the American West.

And lest there be any doubt that McCain was donning the mantle and embracing the legacy of the Bush administration, the President also issued his own statement in the Rose Garden, the cherry on top. Here's a link to the fact sheet of what Bush called for. Top 2 items? Drilling offshore and development of oil shale.

There's nothing new in this energy policy, although McCain and Bush tried to sell it as a brand new cure for high gas prices. It's neither brand new, nor a cure. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) -- the arm of the government responsible for official energy statistics -- said so.

It was merely the endless fossil future repackaged to suit this moment of $4 gas, which everybody knows is not going away. But maybe pain at the pump and fear of communists in our waters might pave the way for wishful thinking that relies on development of oil shale and other unconventional fuels. And continued denial of global warming.

That's squarely where the future of the oil industry rests. Take a look at this organization chart of the Strategic Unconventional Fuels Task Force and you'll see how this effort is being managed out of the Department of Energy's Office of Petroleum Reserves.

Reporting into that office are the three working groups of the Task Force: Oil Shale and Tar Sands; Enhanced Oil Recovery and Heavy Oil; Coal-to-Liquid Fuels. It gets hard to breathe just reading the names of those three working groups.

And here is what it says in the Executive Summary of the report the Task Force prepared for the President and Congress:

The days of cheap oil are likely over. As discovery and production of conventional oil becomes more difficult and costly..... the world and ur nation must now begin a transition to the next most economic and energy efficient set of energy resources. As it may take 20 years or more to achieve an industry capable of producing significant volumes of unconventional fuels, urgent action to initiate the transition is needed.

Our nation is endowed with a wealth of resources that can be converted to fuels for transportation, home heating, and other uses. These include coal, heavy oil, and oil producible by carbon dioxide enhanced recovery....

Oil sands development success in the Province of Alberta, Canada provides a laudable example of industry, government, and stakeholder collaboration that could be emulated.....

The oil sands "a laudable example that could be emulated?" OMFG. The full report is available here, and it makes for chilling reading.

It is the Cheney blueprint of the fossil future, now embraced by McCain. It calls for massive government support for a 20 year project to develop these carbon-heavy unconventional fuels.

Solar, wind, geothermal -- weren't those supposed to be the unconventional fuels of the future? Not in the vision of Dick Cheney, now embraced by John McCain.

If elected, who will he turn to help him manage his energy

policy?
solveclimate.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext