SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 322.31-5.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Big Bucks who wrote (8882)10/18/1997 2:05:00 AM
From: William Triplett   of 70976
 
Intel is in trouble, their proprietary slot 1 design and high
cost is keeping all but the extreme high end customers away on their
newest design "Tillamook",


Tillamook (the .25 micron version of the Pentium w/MMX) is designed
for mobile computing and as such is not implemented with the slot 1
design. Currently, Tillamook is being offered in both the TCP and MMO
packaging. Notebook vendors are implementing both.

plus the fact that it will be replaced within 6 months with the
slot 2 successor.


Slot 2 is not a successor to slot 1. Intel is introducing an
"economies of scale" approach here which involves more than just the
CPU core, which in this case is the P6. Slot 2 will incorporate a more
advanced (faster and larger) L2 cache and, as I recall, allow more
than 2 CPUs. As such, Slot 2 will be more expensive and therefor
targeted to very high-end machines such as servers. Slot 1 is targeted
for the destop. Intel calls this approach "complimentary" - as apposed
to "competitive".

Last I looked, Intel's "proprietary" Slot 1 was being well represented
by the board venders. This, of course, does not bode well for AMD or
CYRX in the long term.

Regards,
Bill
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext