SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stefan who wrote (82806)8/7/2008 11:18:53 AM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
Stefan: "
Galileo and Copernicus were nuts too they defy scientific consensus as it was at the time. I would not use majority or consensus in science as a fact – show me concrete evidence. By the way where is the “ether” that was so well described in the early 20th century?
Keep in mind that scientists have agenda just like politicians; it never hurts to be skeptical!

KOAN: not quite. Galileo and Coprenicus were jailed and almost tortured and killed by the church for heresy, (which is what the church did to heretics in those days). Their crime: saying the earth revolved around the sun!

They called that era the dark ages, because the church did not allow any dissent (or science that challenged the church's teachings) upon penalty of torture and death.

No one on earth more skeptical than me, but being skeptical when the vast majority of the best scientific minds are telling us we are in danger is not so smart. Prudent caution would make more sense to me.

If you are walking through the forest and natives tell you a rabid bear or tiger is killing people and to be careful, I would think prudent caution would be more important than skepticism.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext