SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic
INTC 44.06-3.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Captain Jack who wrote (11499)10/18/1997 10:45:00 AM
From: Sonki   of 27012
 
john, i m very disappointed by action in amat, it' overdone or i m just stupid and don't see something very obvious that maybe happenening. i need to figure it out what's going on. I want to add to my amats, this is taking us back to July level.

Also, sunw, i just could not belive that they missed. Sunw has never missed in last 13qurters that i have watched. Also, i belive sunw could have cut on expenses to meet the earnings but they are expanding like crazy buying land and builidings etc... If they wait on epxansion i guess there would be no office space or land would be more expensive? i don't know why they could not come up w. lousy 2 more cents. can you recommend adding more at this level? i bot some on friday and want to buy some leaps on monday.

To: Sonki (4902 )
From: Ben Antanaitis
Friday, Oct 17 1997 5:03PM EST
Reply #4905 of 4933

Bob Pisani, of CNBC, was talking about the NASDQ action around 3PM and said that
the CFO of SUNW had been holding private conversations with the wall st. analysts. He
was basically telling them that business was very good and tthat he felt the sell off was
way over done, and that the next quarter is off to a great start.

From the after 3PM action, sounds like some folks started buying... or was that their plan
all the long... take from the poor and give to the rich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext