SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (1277)8/8/2008 12:05:53 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 86355
 
Which it certainly isn't.

Which it clearly is, and by a very large amount.

Then we should just import everything and have our trade imbalance 100% of our GDP.

Oil is worth more than the cost, that wouldn't be the case if we tried to import everything. A policy to import no matter what would be silly, but it isn't a policy that vaguely resembles a free market, where real people will buy domestically when it makes sense, and where domestic suppliers will try to fight for the market, both here, and overseas.

The alternatives are subsidized to a greater extent than the conventional energy is.

No way.


yes way, and again to a large extent

We are fighting a resource war.

Military spending is not an oil subsidy.

The nice thing about electric is that the infrastructure is entirely in place

Not to a sufficient extent, esp. not if you want the electricity to be produced from alternative sources.

And the infrastructure also includes the facilities for battery production, and recycling or disposal, more high voltage charge stations, and such, not just electrical production and distribution.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext